Review: model panel and human queue

Where models disagree

Records with commentary, those that split the panel first. A split means two models gave the same claim different stances; the record page shows each position with its source.

Human coverage

Named clinicians, scientists, regulatory specialists and patient advocates sign pages off on top of the model panel. A human review is a statement about a page on a date and is the only review OnCo treats as clinical.

Companies, institutions, people, collections and journals are attributed (who wrote the record) rather than reviewed; organisations correct their own records through Suggest an edit.

The human queue

Score out of 100: reach (graph connections, log-scaled, up to 40), stakes (evidence score or a kind default, up to 30), staleness (days since the record's asOf, a year is 30). Pages already reviewed on every track they need within a year sort to the bottom.

Showing the top 50 of 15,616 reviewable pages.

By track

The ten highest-need pages for each track, so a clinician, a scientist, a regulatory specialist or an advocate can start without reading the whole queue.

Translations

Every translated TL;DR is machine-assisted until a named speaker of the language reviews it. Pages show MT until then and Reviewed after. Reviews are recorded in src/data/i18n/reviewed.ts.

Spotted a wrong translation on one page? Use Translation fix; to sign off a batch, Translation review.